Showing posts with label cats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cats. Show all posts

Thursday, 8 June 2023

Fantasy fiction is the best fiction there is, and that's a fact.

 

We've all seen that ridiculous take-down of Brandon Sanderson, number one fantasy author, by an attention seeker, right? I've got some thoughts about it.

Before we get too serious, though, here's a picture of an idiot.



Honest to God, I can't figure out if anything's going on in his little head.

(Heads up before we continue, these blogposts are taken from my exclusive newsletter, and thus are a couple of months behind. Sign up for the latest chit-chat, and for a free Pieces Of Eight prequel novel, Krakenvale.)

(Heads up number 2 - all Amazon links are affiliate links, I get the tiniest tip from any purchase, they all go towards Tonto's crunchies bowl.)

Hello again, crew, it's been awhile. My fault entirely, obvs. To cut a dull story incredibly short, my inspiration briefly fell off a cliff towards the end of last year, but 2023 has so far been a period of explosive creativity. I've got a lot coming, more even than I promised in my last newsletter (oh so long ago).

Silus de Senza and his pirate lunatics are coming back for more, and I've got a new paranormal series on the way very, very soon.

But this newsletter is about something else (I gave that away at the start, didn't I?) Reading about what happened to Brandon Sanderson at the hands of a Wired journalist provoked me into writing a newsletter for the first time in a heck of a while - and made me realise what the theme of this newsletter will be going forward. SFF, speculative fiction, all that jazz, is the best that fiction can be, and I'm going to shout it as loud as I can from my little platform, and I want to encourage us as a community towards positive action and away from some of the darker corners of fandom.

Some of my conclusions will be fairly obvious already, but something I've got to say in response to the affair might not be, and - a quick heads up - I won't apologise for it.

I will say this: I'm no Sanderson fanboy. I've only read the first two books of The Stormlight Archive. They're good, but they're also huge books that go into great detail on every single aspect of the world he's created. I can see why he's popular though, and I'll likely continue the series at some point.



For the sake of sanity and to avoid making a fool out of yours truly, I read the original article for myself, and... the majority of the complaints against it stand up.

It opens with a frankly incredible claim - that no one on Wired - which believes itself to be a nerd magazine - had heard of Brandon Sanderson. Really? Can you call yourself a nerd if you're that far out of touch? There's also a claim that there have been no major interviews or pieces written about Sanderson until they came along. A very swift Google search can prove that wrong. If you can't get this basic level of research done properly...

From here it's easy to conclude that this hit piece is solely designed as a self-promotional effort for the writer. It's an easy way of getting attention - and it's worked! Hey, even I've fallen for it! I'm writing about it right now, and it could easily drive more traffic to the very piece I'm calling out.

Anyway, we move onto the writer's fairly savage distaste for Mormons. I was initially surprised that this element of the piece got past the editor, until I clocked that Kehe is senior editor at Wired. He simply cannot stop jibing at Mormons at every chance he can. Would he refer to a company of 50-strong-people/Christians or a company of 50-strong-people/atheists or a company of 50-strong-people/heathens? I've got to wonder. Editorially speaking, there's got to be a reason behind such a through-line, but what is the purpose here? One can only infer that this is the stance of Wired as a whole. Are there any other religions on the website's hitlist? I'm not religious myself, but I certainly wouldn't target those of faith with such a sneer of an opening section as this journalist provides.

Now, here's the kicker. The journalist spends a lot of the article telling us that Sanderson doesn't have anything interesting to say, and I mean a lot. It's a four thousand word article. Anyone else see the irony in this? Even better, it apparently took two months to put the piece together.

The biggest issue I have lies with the journalist's repeated statement (he bitches about Sanderson loving his own voice, but boy can this guy repeat himself) that Brandon's writing is bad. I want to put this here, loud and clear: it's wrong. I'm afraid this statement cannot even be put down to opinion. Perhaps the journalist doesn't like the style of writing, but it isn't bad. It's factually incorrect. It literally cannot be. Sanderson has too many fans who love his characters and his world-building. Where does that stuff come from? The words he strings together.

I genuinely cannot find the words to explain how much this (repeated) part of the article pissed me off (probs coz I write bad, eh Kehe?). It shows an fundamental failure to grasp what fiction writing is actually for. It is meant to transport. Coleridge would weep. We, the readers, have one job: suspend our disbelief. Allow the writer to do the rest. For Sanderson's readers, he is doing the job admirably. What can a certain breed of journalist do? Sneer at those who have found something to enjoy.